
Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in D:\www\www164\blog\wp-config.php on line 31
{"id":98,"date":"2014-12-16T18:00:56","date_gmt":"2014-12-16T16:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/?p=98"},"modified":"2021-03-15T17:35:26","modified_gmt":"2021-03-15T15:35:26","slug":"isoelectric-point-calculation-of-native-proteins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/bioinformatics\/2014\/12\/isoelectric-point-calculation-of-native-proteins\/","title":{"rendered":"Isoelectric point calculation of native proteins"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The isoelectric point (pI) of native (not denaturated) proteins is important in several separation techniques. The pI is defined as the pH value at which the positive and negative charges on the protein are balanced and the net charge is zero. To determine the pH at which the net charge is zero, the charge on the protein is calculated at multiple pH values using Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, as described by <a title=\"PubMed\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/2774179\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sillero and Ribeiro (1989)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Charge of type N (negative) groups:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Basic-charges.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-100\" src=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Basic-charges-300x101.png\" alt=\"Basic charges\" width=\"300\" height=\"101\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Basic-charges-300x101.png 300w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Basic-charges-50x16.png 50w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Basic-charges-400x134.png 400w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Basic-charges.png 412w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Charge of type P (positive) groups:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Acidic-charges.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-99\" src=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Acidic-charges-300x101.png\" alt=\"Acidic charges\" width=\"300\" height=\"101\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Acidic-charges-300x101.png 300w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Acidic-charges-50x16.png 50w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Acidic-charges-400x135.png 400w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Acidic-charges.png 407w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Total charge:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Total-charges.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-102\" src=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Total-charges.png\" alt=\"Total charges\" width=\"257\" height=\"61\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Total-charges.png 257w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Total-charges-50x11.png 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 257px) 100vw, 257px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The usage of appropiate pK values is of crucial importance to caluclate correct pI. For denatured proteins, <a title=\"PubMed\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/8125050\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bjellqvist et al. (1993)<\/a> published an accurate methode to predict the focusing position of polypeptide in immmobilized pH gradients under denaturing conditions (8 M urea). On the other hand, amino acid side chain pK values of native proteins where measured using NMR. <a title=\"PMC\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC2708032\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Grimsley et al. (2008)<\/a> summarized 541 pK values of 78 folded proteins measured with NMR which were taken to calculate average pK values for each type of amino acid side chain. An algorithm to determine the isoelectric point of native protein using these average pK values is implemented in Prot pi\u2019s <a title=\"Prot pi\" href=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/Calculator\/ProteinTool\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Protein Tool<\/a>. Choose \u201cnative\u201d option in the \u201cAdvanced\u201d tab to take advantage of this algorithm (figure 1).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_101\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-101\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Parameters.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-101\" src=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Parameters-300x177.png\" alt=\"Figure 1: How to use the algorithm to calculate isoelectric points of native proteins.\" width=\"300\" height=\"177\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Parameters-300x177.png 300w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Parameters-1024x607.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Parameters-50x29.png 50w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Parameters-800x474.png 800w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Parameters-400x237.png 400w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Parameters.png 2030w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-101\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1: How to use the algorithm to calculate isoelectric points of native proteins.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><!--more-->The calculated and the measured isoelectric point of five proteins with different properties were compared. Homo-and heteromultimeric, basic and acidic as well as small and very large proteins were taken to validate the calculated pI (table 1).<\/p>\n<span id=\"tablepress-1-description\" class=\"tablepress-table-description tablepress-table-description-id-1\">Table 1: Calculated pI compared with measured pI out of literature of native and denaturated proteins. Measured pI were taken from <a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/j.1749-6632.1973.tb47529.x\/abstract\" target=\"-blank\">Ui (2006)<\/a>, except: *) <a href=\"http:\/\/pubs.rsc.org\/en\/content\/articlelanding\/2015\/an\/c4an01305k#!divAbstract\" target=\"_blank\">Przybylski (2015)<\/a> and **) <a href=\"http:\/\/jem.rupress.org\/content\/159\/3\/828.abstract\" target=\"_blank\">Stone-Wolff (1984)<\/a><\/span>\n\n<table id=\"tablepress-1\" class=\"tablepress tablepress-id-1\" aria-describedby=\"tablepress-1-description\">\n<thead>\n<tr class=\"row-1\">\n\t<th class=\"column-1\">Protein<\/th><th class=\"column-2\">Uniprot #<\/th><th class=\"column-3\">pI, measured, native<\/th><th class=\"column-4\">pI, measured, denaturated<\/th><th class=\"column-5\">pI,<br \/>\ncalculated, native<\/th><th class=\"column-6\">pI,<br \/>\ncalculated, denatured<\/th><th class=\"column-7\">Comments<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody class=\"row-striping row-hover\">\n<tr class=\"row-2\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Interferon-\u03b3<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">>sp|P01579|24-161<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">9.95*<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">9.2**<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">9.985<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">9.329<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Homodimer<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-3\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Hemoglobin<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">>sp|P69905|2-142<br \/>\n>sp|P68871|2-147<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">7.1<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">7.14<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">8.037<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">7.721<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Heterotetramer<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-4\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Insulin<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">>sp|P01317|85-105<br \/>\n>sp|P01317|25-54<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">5.72<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">5.76<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">5.535<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">5.438<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Disulfide linked heterodimer<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-5\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Ribonuclease<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">>sp|P61823|27-150<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">9.33<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">9.58<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">9.743<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">9.19<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Basic pI<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-6\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Thyroglobulin<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">>tr|D1KKB3|20-2692<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">4.5<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">5.3<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">5.534<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">5.433<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Very large (582.5 kDa)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-7\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Serum albumin<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">>sp|P02768|25-609<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">5.8<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">5.9<\/td><td class=\"column-5\">5.861<\/td><td class=\"column-6\">5.724<\/td><td class=\"column-7\">Acidic pI<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<!-- #tablepress-1 from cache -->\n<p>The calculated pI values showed reasonably good agreement with experimental ones for all of the six proteins under native and denaturing conditions over a wide range of physico-chemical properties (figure 2).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_103\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-103\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/141213_pI_calc_vs_exp.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-103\" src=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/141213_pI_calc_vs_exp-300x283.png\" alt=\"Figure 2: Correlation of experimental and calculated isoelectric point (pI) of native (blue) and denaturated (green) proteins.\" width=\"300\" height=\"283\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/141213_pI_calc_vs_exp-300x283.png 300w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/141213_pI_calc_vs_exp-1024x967.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/141213_pI_calc_vs_exp-50x47.png 50w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/141213_pI_calc_vs_exp-518x490.png 518w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/141213_pI_calc_vs_exp-259x245.png 259w, https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/141213_pI_calc_vs_exp.png 1158w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-103\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2: Correlation of experimental and calculated isoelectric point (pI) of native (blue) and denaturated (green) proteins.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p><a title=\"Protein Tool\" href=\"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/Calculator\/ProteinTool\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Prot pi<\/a> provides an accurate tool to calculate isoelectric points of denatured and native proteins that takes charge contributions of multiple subunits, disulfide bonds and posttranslational modifications into account.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The isoelectric point (pI) of native (not denaturated) proteins is important in several separation techniques. The pI is defined as the pH value at which the positive and negative charges on the protein are balanced and the net charge is zero. To determine the pH at which the net charge is zero, the charge on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[7,18,3],"class_list":["post-98","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bioinformatics","tag-bioinformatics","tag-isoelectric-point","tag-protpi"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=98"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":557,"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98\/revisions\/557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=98"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=98"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.protpi.ch\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=98"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}